Infrastructure Security1 / 5
A company is migrating its on-premises web application to AWS. The application must be protected against OWASP Top 10 threats including SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS). The security team wants a managed solution that requires minimal rule maintenance. Which approach provides the BEST protection with the LEAST operational overhead?
CorrectIncorrect
Alex
AWS WAF with Managed Rules provides pre-configured rule sets that protect against OWASP Top 10 threats with minimal maintenance. The Core Rule Set (CRS) covers general web vulnerabilities including XSS and local file inclusion, while the SQL Database rule group specifically blocks SQL injection attacks. Attaching WAF to the ALB inspects HTTP traffic before it reaches the application. Network Firewall operates at layers 3-4 with Suricata rules—effective but requires custom rule maintenance, adding operational overhead. CloudFront with OAC controls origin access but does not inspect request payloads for injection attacks. A third-party WAF on EC2 requires provisioning, patching, and rule management—the highest operational burden. Key concept: WAF Managed Rules are AWS-maintained, automatically updated, and purpose-built for OWASP protection (docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/aws-managed-rule-groups-list.html).
Sourcedocs.aws.amazon.com
Follow-up answers are available in the app. Create a free account — no credit card required.
Question 1 of 5
Create a free account